How To Clean Dog Urine Off Couch Cushions That Aren't Machine Washable

Image: New studies show that COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely permanently

(Natural News) Worried virtually Omicron? Guess what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave yous is going to make youMORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you'll make it for the virus.

(Article by Steve Kirsch republished from SteveKirsch.Substack.com)

In short, we've been lied to nearly the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While y'all may go a benefit for before variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, merely at the expense of a degradation of your overall amnesty to everything else.

These vaccines may help you win the war against a variant that may soon exist rare, but the price you pay is that you make your immunity to everything else worse. Information technology's a impaired tradeoff (especially since early treatments piece of work then well). But the people making the laws won't believe any of the scientific discipline referenced in this article, then it will continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet nigh a study in Denmark which instantly went viral as you can encounter from the number of retweets:

Holy moly.

This study shows that after three months the vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer & Moderna against Omicron is actually negative. Pfizer customers are 76.5% more likely and Moderna customers are 39.3% more probable to be infected than unvaxxed people. https://t.co/wPgAwG8BW3pic.twitter.com/3Oh3IJSVIk

— Ezra Levant ? (@ezralevant) Dec 23, 2022

I want to tell you what this really means and how it is beingness attacked.

Summary: Reject to comply with mandates. Now.

This paper means nosotros will need to inject people every xxx days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our immune system, it's likely that the needed interval volition shorten with each booster.

If people don't get boosted equally required, they will be More vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That's what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy ways. Information technology doesn't mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It ways the OPPOSITE of what yous were told:it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (by suppressing your allowed arrangement, probably permanently each fourth dimension we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means nosotros were lied to.

Brighteon.TV

In short, the vaccine is similar a heroin addiction: once y'all've had a taste of information technology, you are hooked: you have to go on it for life if you desire protection. If you stop information technology, you're a sitting duck for the virus.

What'due south worse is our government is mandating this now. In light of this newspaper, they will change the vaccine mandates to forcefulness you to go vaccinated every month or you will be fired from your chore. Their next move could well be to make it illegal not to be vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are rapidly stripping away your rights to do anything without a vaccination.

And we have no clue what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination will exercise to your torso. This has never been tested.

My communication is elementary. If you have been vaccinated, you need to stop now. Do not get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is fond of repeating the one-time adage, "When you lot detect yourself in a hole, stop digging ."

Sadly, almost people cannot afford to lose their jobs, and so they volition get vaccinated and medical professionals volition non speak out since doing so volition cause them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower cost style to end the pandemic

Everyone needs to stop listening to the CDC at present and start listening to people who have been saying to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.

The unabridged pandemic will finish as shortly equally the CDC stops ignoring the existing early treatment protocols which have been available since March 2022 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was first available back and then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could have (and nevertheless can) cease the hospitalization and death with simply 1 thing: early on treatment. Only like Japan has done. But the CDC refused to listen.

What the paper said in particular

First, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the newspaper. The current version can exist plant here.

Kickoff at the comments, both from social media and also from medrxiv readers.

Bank check out the social media portion of the comments

Hither are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

Then assume the results you similar (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, simply manus wave confounders at results yous don't like (negative VE for distant vaccination)? Scientific discipline?
This is a superb paper, especially the careful approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.
Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at 90 days, but worse, actually driblet into stiff negative effectiveness after that time.This would mean that these vaccines *increase* one's chances of infection later the initial 90 days "honeymoon" menstruation.Am I getting this right?If so, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is condign ascendant?

The primal textile is in the full PDF:

The graphs to a higher place tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not you.

Then at 60 days, the protection is close to zero, and so if y'all want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune organization and then it is already "geared up" to fight the virus. That'southward non what a vaccine is supposed to do.

Furthermore, the negative VE after 90 days means you are hooked for life and I would gauge (based on the mechanism of activity), that we volition need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you get (since it kills off your immune organization every fourth dimension).

So information technology could very well be monthly boosters later on the 2nd dose, weekly boosters after the third dose, and maybe daily boosters subsequently the 4th dose to maintain your "immunity."

You can't stop after that because if you stop, y'all're in worse shape than if you lot never started.

The stunning conclusion of the newspaper

In low-cal of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the demand for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their written report ways.

They too wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it equally noted in the italics were my add-on):

The negative estimates in the last period arguablysuggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This waslikely the upshot of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake up phone call: the vaccines do not work. Finish repeating the insanity.

Early treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don't "claw you," and they don't cause disability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd accept almost no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't do that since medical lath will take abroad the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening at present.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are corrupt and incompetent and they volition not hold themselves accountable in an open argue. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… it's nothing new. The volume "Evidence of harm" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), merely any neutral thinking person will side against the authorities.

Why the paper went viral

And so, the reason this paper went viral is because

It is well done,
It was washed past PhDs in communicable diseases and epidemiology,
The results show what is really happening, and
Nobody has been able to assault the newspaper with a credible argument, even on Twitter.
It confirms what my team of experts has been saying about negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the paper:

The article says that it's not peer reviewed and is not published in any scientific journals.

And so without verification there are all kinds of claims out there about all kinds of things. We go past those principles that take passed peer review to split fact and fiction.

— RobertNorton (@robertnorton_) December 23, 2022

It is impossible to have a negative VE. You cannot take a negative VE. The absolute everyman VE is null, which infers no protection whatever. Your statement is completely fake, including the information table that isn't even in the study you lot cited.

— SwingTrader (@SwingTrader1114) Dec 23, 2022

Supporting evidence

The paper isn't a fluke. At that place is lots of other show in support of the negative VE (and non supporting their speculative explanation for information technology).

Here's the data from Canada which shows that we have it backwards. We should be mandating "no vaccines" in order to go along your job and fire all the vaccinated people considering these people are the about risky.

In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated accept skyrocketed higher up cases per capita among the unvaccinated.Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire example for restricting vaccinated people is their presumed college per capita infection rate.

Here's the UK information showing the aforementioned thing. We demand to flip around the mandates ASAP.

It looks similar the U.K. data may back up the vaccine-enhanced infection issue both FDA and I have raised.https://t.co/ewFK0ByA4N

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) December 22, 2022

Other supporting data:

On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination and the video virtually that paper. If the vaccines don't kill y'all, they volition go out you weaker. Over xc% of the deaths investigated later vaccination were found to have been caused past the vaccines. In that location is no other explanation.
The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
An excellent article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the effect that the more than you vaccinate, the more y'all make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate immune systems.
Vaccine efficacy declines to exist negative in the Uk (Expose commodity)
Booster protection fades within 10 weeks against Omicron: Great britain study
Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for about 10 weeks, report finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022
This substack article looks at the Danish study (described here) and the United kingdom data. Note that the VE numbers in the two studies are unlike because if you separate our Omicron, yous get a very different picture of VE compared to analyses that don't separate out VE by variant.
Dr. Ron Chocolate-brown – Opinion EditorialDecember 23, 2022Ontario, Canada reported five,790 new COVID-19 cases on Th, December 23, 2022, setting the province's one-day tape for new cases since the beginning of the pandemic: Ontario: Instance numbers | COVID-xix. Thursday'south numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to iv,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a rapidly rising trend over the past several weeks clearly showing that nigh new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.